I am writing about this again today to report that earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin reaffirmed its position on this in a case called Skindzelewski v. Smith, which you can read here.
Professor Alberto Bernabe - The University of Illinois-Chicago School of Law
Monday, June 29, 2020
Wisconsin reaffirms that criminal defendants must show actual innocence to support malpractice claim against former defense counsel
Long time readers of this blog may remember that I have posted many stories commenting on the fact that many (probably most) jurisdictions require former criminal defendants to prove actual innocence as a requirement to support malpractice claims against their criminal defense counsel. In recent years, a number of jurisdictions have rejected this notion, but it still seems to be the majority approach.
I am writing about this again today to report that earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin reaffirmed its position on this in a case called Skindzelewski v. Smith, which you can read here.
I am writing about this again today to report that earlier this month, the Supreme Court of Wisconsin reaffirmed its position on this in a case called Skindzelewski v. Smith, which you can read here.
Labels:
Criminal justice system,
Malpractice,
Wisconsin
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment