In Celgard, the Federal Circuit disqualified law firm Jones Day because it was representing Celgard in a patent dispute while it continued to represent Apple in other matters, even though Apple's connection to the case was that it had a business relationship with one of the parties.
As Prof. Rotunda explains, if one reads Celgard too broadly, it is a potentially dangerous opinion, but there is no need to do
that because there is no conflict simply because a law firm represents a
client and the result in the case would make it more difficult or more
expensive for another client to purchase goods or services.
No comments:
Post a Comment